Re: Second RewriteQuery complains about first RewriteQuery in edge case
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
From: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
To: Bernice Southey <bernice.southey@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-27T17:28:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 at 14:31, Bernice Southey <bernice.southey@gmail.com> wrote: > > FWIW, I think I found a way to fix my bug that doesn't break your > rules example. I added a bool to RewriteQuery, and used this to stop > reprocessing updatable view CTEs. This leaves the rules recursion path > unchanged. Which means rule CTEs might still be processed repeatedly. Unfortunately, that means that it suffers from a bug similar to the original one, but with an INSTEAD OF rule instead of an updatable view: --- drop table if exists t1, t2, t3; create table t1 (a int generated always as identity); create table t2 (a int); create table t3 (a int); create rule t3r as on insert to t3 do instead insert into t2 values (new.a) returning *; with x as (insert into t1 default values returning *) insert into t3 select * from x; --- That fails in HEAD and with your patch with the same error as before, but it works correctly with the v2 patch. Regards, Dean