Re: const correctness
Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <munro@ip9.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-11-09T15:33:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 9 November 2011 15:24, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:. > If you go down this road you soon start needing duplicate functions > for no other reason than that one takes/returns "const" and one doesn't. Why would you have to do that? To my mind, the fact that const "spreads" is a feature, not a deficiency. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services