Re: Materialized views WIP patch

Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail@joh.to>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@mail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-26T13:42:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 26 November 2012 13:07, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> None of those patches were small patches.  It's going to take multiple
> years to get materialized views up to a state where they're really
> useful to a broad audience in production applications, but I don't
> think we should sneer at anyone for writing a patch that is "just
> syntactic sugar".

+1. I have a sweet tooth. I don't like it when people criticise
patches on the basis of "obviously you could achieve the same effect
with $CONVOLUTION". Making things simpler is a desirable outcome. Now,
that isn't to say that we should disregard everything or even anything
else in pursuit of simplicity; just that "needing a Ph.D is
Postgresology", as you once put it, to do something routine to many is
really hard to defend.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Preserve intermediate .c files in coverage mode