Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail@joh.to>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@mail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-26T13:42:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 26 November 2012 13:07, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > None of those patches were small patches. It's going to take multiple > years to get materialized views up to a state where they're really > useful to a broad audience in production applications, but I don't > think we should sneer at anyone for writing a patch that is "just > syntactic sugar". +1. I have a sweet tooth. I don't like it when people criticise patches on the basis of "obviously you could achieve the same effect with $CONVOLUTION". Making things simpler is a desirable outcome. Now, that isn't to say that we should disregard everything or even anything else in pursuit of simplicity; just that "needing a Ph.D is Postgresology", as you once put it, to do something routine to many is really hard to defend. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Preserve intermediate .c files in coverage mode
- 4af3dda13601 9.3.0 cited