Re: Draft release notes complete

Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>

To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

Cc: Vik Reykja <vikreykja@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2012-05-10T13:12:57Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Expose track_iotiming information via pg_stat_statements.
- 5b4f34661143 9.2.0 cited
Rewrite GiST support code for rangetypes.
- 80da9e68fdd7 9.2.0 cited
Clean up a couple of box gist helper functions.
- d50e1251946a 9.2.0 cited
Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a
- 7f3bd86843e5 9.2.0 cited

On 10 May 2012 13:45, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Right, but I think it would be good to identify them explicitly as reviewers
> if we're going to include the names.

+1. I think we should probably do more to credit reviewers. It's not
uncommon for a reviewer to end up becoming a co-author, particularly
if they're a committer, but it's a little misleading to add a reviewer
after the feature description without qualifying that they are the
reviewer.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services