Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples
Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-15T17:29:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Incorporate a couple of recent tuplesort.c improvements into tuplestore.c.
- 2689abf07849 8.2.0 cited
On 15 November 2012 16:09, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm still not too sure why this part is OK: > > /* This may not be our first time through */ > if (newmemtupsize <= memtupsize) > return false; > > Suppose we enlarge the memtuples array by something other than a > multiple of 2, and then we kick out all of the tuples that are > currently in memory and load a new group with a smaller average size. > ISTM that it could now appear that the memtuples array can be useful > further enlarged, perhaps by as little as one tuple, and that that > this could happen repeatedly. I think we should either refuse to grow > the array unless we can increase it by at least, say, 10%, or else set > a flag after the final enlargement that acts as a hard stop to any > further growth. I thought that the flag added to Tuplesortstate in earlier revisions was a little bit ugly. I can see the concern though, and I suppose that given the alternative is to add a heuristic, simply using a flag may be the best way to proceed. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services