Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@mail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-26T16:02:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 26 November 2012 15:24, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: > I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add REFRESH > SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more REFRESH > options to come. I don't know that they should be called materialised views, but do we really need to overload the word snapshot? I'd just as soon invent a new word as use the Oracle one, since I don't think the term snapshot is widely recognised as referring to anything other than snapshot isolation. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Preserve intermediate .c files in coverage mode
- 4af3dda13601 9.3.0 cited