Re: Materialized views WIP patch

Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@mail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-26T16:02:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 26 November 2012 15:24, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add REFRESH
> SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more REFRESH
> options to come.

I don't know that they should be called materialised views, but do we
really need to overload the word snapshot? I'd just as soon invent a
new word as use the Oracle one, since I don't think the term snapshot
is widely recognised as referring to anything other than snapshot
isolation.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Preserve intermediate .c files in coverage mode