Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings

On 3 August 2011 12:19, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> Right, but the purpose of that check is to defend from programmer error. If
> the programmer screws up and calls "PQresStatus(-1)", we want to give an
> error, not crash. If you assume that the programmer will only pass a valid
> enum constant as parameter, then you might as well remove the if-statement
> altogether. I don't think that would be an improvement.

Ahh. I failed to consider the intent of the code.

Attached patch has a better solution than casting though - we simply
use an enum literal. The fact that PGRES_EMPTY_QUERY is the first
value in the enum can be safely assumed to be stable, not least
because we've even already explicitly given it a corresponding value
of 0.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services