Re: recoveryCheck/008_fsm_truncation is failing on dodo in v14- (due to slow fsync?)

Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>

From: Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-22T11:52:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 at 18:30, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:

> So it doesn't seem impossible for this operation to last for more than two
> minutes.
>
> The facts that SyncDataDirectory() is executed between these two messages
> logged, 008_fsm_truncation is the only test which turns fsync on, and we
> see no such failures in newer branches (because of a7f417107), make me
> suspect that dodo is slow on fsync.
>


Not sure if it helps but I can confirm that dodo is used for multiple tasks
and that
it is using a (slow) external USB3 disk. Also, while using dodo last week
(for
something unrelated), I noticed iotop at ~30MB/s usage & 1-min CPU around
~7.

Right now (while dodo's idle), via dd I see ~30MB/s is pretty much the max:

pi@pi4:/media/pi/250gb $ dd if=/dev/zero of=./test count=1024 oflag=direct
bs=128k
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
134217728 bytes (134 MB, 128 MiB) copied, 4.51225 s, 29.7 MB/s

pi@pi4:/media/pi/250gb $ dd if=/dev/zero of=./test count=1024 oflag=dsync
bs=128k
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
134217728 bytes (134 MB, 128 MiB) copied, 24.4916 s, 5.5 MB/s

-
robins