Thread
Commits
-
Typo fix
- 519d71072015 18.0 landed
- d4f8517b0b94 17.0 landed
-
a potential typo in comments of pg_parse_json
Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> — 2024-07-08T08:24:49Z
Not 100% sure, sorry if this doesn't make sense. --- a/src/common/jsonapi.c +++ b/src/common/jsonapi.c @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ freeJsonLexContext(JsonLexContext *lex) * * If FORCE_JSON_PSTACK is defined then the routine will call the non-recursive * JSON parser. This is a useful way to validate that it's doing the right - * think at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see + * thing at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see * regression diffs relating to error messages about stack depth, but no * other differences. */ -- Regards Junwang Zhao
-
Re: a potential typo in comments of pg_parse_json
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> — 2024-07-08T13:16:33Z
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 5:25 PM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote: > Not 100% sure, sorry if this doesn't make sense. > > --- a/src/common/jsonapi.c > +++ b/src/common/jsonapi.c > @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ freeJsonLexContext(JsonLexContext *lex) > * > * If FORCE_JSON_PSTACK is defined then the routine will call the non-recursive > * JSON parser. This is a useful way to validate that it's doing the right > - * think at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see > + * thing at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see > * regression diffs relating to error messages about stack depth, but no > * other differences. > */ Good catch. Fixed. -- Thanks, Amit Langote