Re: Two pg_rewind patches (auto generate recovery conf and ensure clean shutdown)
Paul Guo <pguo@pivotal.io>
From: Paul Guo <pguo@pivotal.io>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Jimmy Yih <jyih@pivotal.io>,
Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>
Date: 2019-03-20T05:23:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:20 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:48:52PM +0800, Paul Guo wrote: > > This is a good suggestion also. Will do it. > > Please note also that we don't care about recovery.conf since v12 as > recovery parameters are now GUCs. I would suggest appending those > extra parameters to postgresql.auto.conf, which is what pg_basebackup > does. > Yes, the recovery conf patch in the first email did like this, i.e. writing postgresql.auto.conf & standby.signal
Commits
-
Improve test coverage of pg_rewind
- 55ba56415bae 13.0 landed
-
Improve handling and coverage of --no-ensure-shutdown in pg_rewind
- caa078353ecd 13.0 landed
-
Fix issues in pg_rewind with --no-ensure-shutdown/--write-recovery-conf
- 6837632b758e 13.0 landed
-
Fix --dry-run mode of pg_rewind
- c2e3b311d9ef 12.1 landed
- 6f3823b03560 13.0 landed
-
pg_rewind: test new --write-recovery-conf functionality
- 7524c788743f 13.0 landed
-
pg_rewind: Allow writing recovery configuration
- 927474ce1a24 13.0 landed
-
Have pg_rewind run crash recovery before rewinding
- 5adafaf176d0 13.0 landed
-
Split out recovery confing-writing code from pg_basebackup
- caba97a9d9f4 13.0 landed
-
Switch TAP tests of pg_rewind to use non-superuser role, take two
- d9f543e9e9be 12.0 cited