Re: Two pg_rewind patches (auto generate recovery conf and ensure clean shutdown)
Paul Guo <pguo@pivotal.io>
From: Paul Guo <pguo@pivotal.io>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Jimmy Yih <jyih@pivotal.io>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>
Date: 2019-07-02T05:54:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 12:35 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2019-Apr-19, Paul Guo wrote: > > > The below patch runs single mode Postgres if needed to make sure the > target > > is cleanly shutdown. A new option is added (off by default). > > v2-0001-Ensure-target-clean-shutdown-at-beginning-of-pg_r.patch > > Why do we need an option for this? Is there a reason not to do this > unconditionally? > There is concern about this (see previous emails in this thread). On greenplum (MPP DB based on Postgres), we unconditionally do this. I'm not sure about usually how Postgres users do this when there is an unclean shutdown, but providing an option seem to be safer to avoid breaking existing script/service whatever. If many people think this option is unnecessary, I'm fine to remove the option and keep the code logic.
Commits
-
Improve test coverage of pg_rewind
- 55ba56415bae 13.0 landed
-
Improve handling and coverage of --no-ensure-shutdown in pg_rewind
- caa078353ecd 13.0 landed
-
Fix issues in pg_rewind with --no-ensure-shutdown/--write-recovery-conf
- 6837632b758e 13.0 landed
-
Fix --dry-run mode of pg_rewind
- c2e3b311d9ef 12.1 landed
- 6f3823b03560 13.0 landed
-
pg_rewind: test new --write-recovery-conf functionality
- 7524c788743f 13.0 landed
-
pg_rewind: Allow writing recovery configuration
- 927474ce1a24 13.0 landed
-
Have pg_rewind run crash recovery before rewinding
- 5adafaf176d0 13.0 landed
-
Split out recovery confing-writing code from pg_basebackup
- caba97a9d9f4 13.0 landed
-
Switch TAP tests of pg_rewind to use non-superuser role, take two
- d9f543e9e9be 12.0 cited