Re: Two pg_rewind patches (auto generate recovery conf and ensure clean shutdown)
Paul Guo <pguo@pivotal.io>
From: Paul Guo <pguo@pivotal.io>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Jimmy Yih <jyih@pivotal.io>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>,
Alexey Kondratov <a.kondratov@postgrespro.ru>
Date: 2019-09-27T03:27:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v9-0001-Add-option-to-write-recovery-configuration-inform.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v9-0001
- v9-0002-Ensure-target-clean-shutdown-in-pg_rewind.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v9-0002
> > > > Note in the 2nd patch, the long option is changed as below. Both the > option > > and description > > now seems to be more concise since we want db state as either > DB_SHUTDOWNED > > or > > DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY. > > > > "-s, --no-ensure-shutdowned do not auto-fix unclean shutdown" > > Note that "shutdowned" is incorrect English; we've let > it live in the code because it's not user-visible, but we should > certainly not immortalize it where it becomes so. I suppose > "--no-ensure-shutdown" is okay, although I think some may prefer > "--no-ensure-shut-down". Opinions from native speakers would be > welcome. Also, let's expand "auto-fix" to "automatically fix" (or > "repair" if there's room in the line? Not sure. Can be bikeshedded to > death I guess.) > I choose that one from the below tree. --no-ensure-shutdown --no-ensure-shutdowned --no-ensure-clean-shutdown Now I agree for user experience we should not use the 2nd one. For --no-ensure-clean-shutdown or -no-ensure-shut-down, seems too many -. I'm using --no-ensure-shutdown in the new version unless there are better suggestions. > > Secondarily, I see no reason to test connstr_source rather than just > "conn" in the other patch; doing it the other way is more natural, since > it's that thing that's tested as an argument. > > pg_rewind.c: Please put the new #include line keeping the alphabetical > order. > Agreed to the above suggestions. I attached the v9. Thanks.
Commits
-
Improve test coverage of pg_rewind
- 55ba56415bae 13.0 landed
-
Improve handling and coverage of --no-ensure-shutdown in pg_rewind
- caa078353ecd 13.0 landed
-
Fix issues in pg_rewind with --no-ensure-shutdown/--write-recovery-conf
- 6837632b758e 13.0 landed
-
Fix --dry-run mode of pg_rewind
- c2e3b311d9ef 12.1 landed
- 6f3823b03560 13.0 landed
-
pg_rewind: test new --write-recovery-conf functionality
- 7524c788743f 13.0 landed
-
pg_rewind: Allow writing recovery configuration
- 927474ce1a24 13.0 landed
-
Have pg_rewind run crash recovery before rewinding
- 5adafaf176d0 13.0 landed
-
Split out recovery confing-writing code from pg_basebackup
- caba97a9d9f4 13.0 landed
-
Switch TAP tests of pg_rewind to use non-superuser role, take two
- d9f543e9e9be 12.0 cited