Re: Lots of memory allocated when reassigning Large Objects

Le lun. 29 nov. 2021 à 22:27, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :

> Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> writes:
> > Le lun. 29 nov. 2021 à 20:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :
> >> [ looks closer ... ]  Ah, that patch is a bit buggy: it fails to do the
> >> right thing in the cases where the loop does a "continue".  The attached
> >> revision seems to behave properly.
>
> > I've tried your patch with my test case. It still uses a lot of memory.
> > Actually even more.
>
> Hmm ... I tried it with your test case, and I see the backend completing
> the query without going beyond 190MB used (which is mostly shared memory).
> Without the patch it blows past that point very quickly indeed.
>
> I'm checking it in HEAD though; perhaps there's something else wrong
> in the back branches?
>
>
That's also what I was thinking. I was only trying with v14. I just checked
with v15devel, and your patch works alright. So there must be something
else with back branches.


-- 
Guillaume.