Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Hi Dilip,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I am getting the below error when running the same test-case that Neha
> shared in her previous email.
>
> ERROR: 55000: some relations of database "test1" are already in
> tablespace "tab1"
> HINT: You must move them back to the database's default tablespace before
> using this command.
> LOCATION: movedb, dbcommands.c:1555
>
> test-case:
> ========
> create tablespace tab1 location '/home/ashu/test1';
> create tablespace tab location '/home/ashu/test';
>
> create database test tablespace tab;
> \c test
>
> create table t(a int primary key, b text);
>
> create or replace function large_val() returns text language sql as
> 'select array_agg(md5(g::text))::text from generate_series(1, 256) g';
>
> insert into t values (generate_series(1,100000), large_val());
>
> alter table t set tablespace tab1 ;
>
> \c postgres
> create database test1 template test;
>
> \c test1
> alter table t set tablespace tab;
>
> \c postgres
> alter database test1 set tablespace tab1; -- this fails with the given
> error.
>
> Observations:
> ===========
> Please note that before running above alter database statement, the table
> 't' is moved to tablespace 'tab' from 'tab1' so not sure why ReadDir() is
> returning true when searching for table 't' in tablespace 'tab1'. It should
> have returned NULL here:
>
> while ((xlde = ReadDir(dstdir, dst_dbpath)) != NULL)
> {
> if (strcmp(xlde->d_name, ".") == 0 ||
> strcmp(xlde->d_name, "..") == 0)
> continue;
>
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
> errmsg("some relations of database \"%s\" are already
> in tablespace \"%s\"",
> dbname, tblspcname),
> errhint("You must move them back to the database's
> default tablespace before using this command.")));
> }
>
> Also, if I run the checkpoint explicitly before executing the above alter
> database statement, this error doesn't appear which means it only happens
> with the new changes because earlier we were doing the force checkpoint at
> the end of createdb statement.
>
Is this expected? I think it is not.
--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.
Commits
-
When using the WAL-logged CREATE DATABASE strategy, bulk extend.
- 3e63e8462f31 16.0 landed
- 576bb0fc9342 15.0 landed
-
Avoid using a fake relcache entry to own an SmgrRelation.
- 1b94f8f232f6 15.0 landed
- 76733b399c49 16.0 landed
-
Fix data-corruption hazard in WAL-logged CREATE DATABASE.
- 692df425b688 16.0 landed
- 811203d4aff5 15.0 landed
-
initdb: When running CREATE DATABASE, use STRATEGY = WAL_COPY.
- ad43a413c4f7 15.0 landed
-
Simplify a needlessly-complicated regular expression.
- c6863b858291 15.0 landed
-
In 020_createdb.pl, change order of command-line arguments.
- 3d067c53b26d 15.0 landed
-
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE.
- 9c08aea6a309 15.0 landed
-
Fix replay of create database records on standby
- 49d9cfc68bf4 15.0 cited
-
Refactor code for reading and writing relation map files.
- 39f0c4bd670c 15.0 landed
-
Replace RelationOpenSmgr() with RelationGetSmgr().
- f10f0ae420ee 15.0 cited
-
Refactor the fsync queue for wider use.
- 3eb77eba5a51 12.0 cited