Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication

Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>

From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>

To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>

Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2026-06-08T08:53:28Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

0003-Add-FIRST-N-and-N-.-priority-syntax-to-synchronized_.patch (application/octet-stream) patch 0003
0001-Refactor-syncrep-parsing-to-represent-bare-standby-l.patch (application/octet-stream) patch 0001
0002-Add-ANY-N-semantics-to-synchronized_standby_slots.patch (application/octet-stream) patch 0002

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:38 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:32 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for tha pathces. I have attached a patch (txt file) with a few
> > trivial changes, take it if you find the changes acceptable.
> >
>
> Thanks, I will review it and share my feedback.
>

PFA the patches that incorporate the changes from the top-up patch
shared by Shveta in [1]. These changes primarily consist of
documentation updates, comment improvements, and indentation fixes at
a few places.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJpy0uAdBxGpc4wtj-LcTGMNkVCYu4eMbDr27snEO_SrN2cV4A%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.