Re: Orphaned users in PG16 and above can only be managed by Superusers
Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-06T05:04:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi Robert, Thanks for the review comments. On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 2:10 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 3:13 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > * The patch alleges to only block DROP ROLE commands when there exists > > _both_ admins of the target role and roles for which the target role is > > an admin. However, it's not clear to me why both need to be true. I > > might be able to glean the reason if I read this thread carefully or > > spend more time thinking about it, but IMHO that patch itself should make > > it obvious. I'd suggest expanding the comment atop > > check_drop_role_dependency(). > > The error message needs work, too. Nobody is ever going to guess what > the rule is from that error message. > I'll handle this in the next patch version. > > * Does this introduce any race conditions? For example, is it possible for > > the new check to pass and then for a dependency to be added before the > > drop completes? > > This is a serious concern for me as well. > This too will be taken care of in the next patch. -- With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma.