Horton

Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes

Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-03-28T01:02:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mar 27, 2017 22:25, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it would have been probably okay to use *int* for ntuples as
>>> that matches with what you are actually assigning in the function.
>>
>> okay, corrected it. Attached is newer version of patch.
>
> Thanks, this version looks good to me.

Committed.


Thank you.

Commits

  1. Still more code review for single-page hash vacuuming.

  2. Another fix for single-page hash index vacuum.