Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication

Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>

From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>

To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>

Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2026-06-08T06:08:48Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:32 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 2:57 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So my preferred behavior would be:
> >
> > 1) duplicate names: normalize, do not error
> > 2) after normalization, if num_sync > unique_slots: error immediately
> >
>
> Thanks for tha pathces. I have attached a patch (txt file) with a few
> trivial changes, take it if you find the changes acceptable.
>

Thanks, I will review it and share my feedback.

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.