Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
To: Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-07-12T11:48:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2012/7/12 Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>: > (2012/07/12 6:04), Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On tor, 2012-06-14 at 21:29 +0900, Shigeru HANADA wrote: >>> I'd like to propose pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL, as a contrib module >>> in core, again. >> >> Do you have any new proposals regarding naming, and how to deal with >> postgresql_fdw_validator, and dblink? > > Yes, I've proposed to rename existing postgresql_fdw_validator to > dblink_fdw_validator and move it into contrib/dblink so that pgsql_fdw > can use the name "postgresql_fdw" and "postgresql_fdw_validator". > Though this post has had no response... > It seems to me what postgresql_fdw_validator() is doing looks like a function to be named as "libpq_fdw_validator()". How about your opinion? It will help this namespace conflicts. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>