Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib

Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
To: Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-07-12T11:48:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2012/7/12 Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>:
> (2012/07/12 6:04), Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tor, 2012-06-14 at 21:29 +0900, Shigeru HANADA wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL, as a contrib module
>>> in core, again.
>>
>> Do you have any new proposals regarding naming, and how to deal with
>> postgresql_fdw_validator, and dblink?
>
> Yes, I've proposed to rename existing postgresql_fdw_validator to
> dblink_fdw_validator and move it into contrib/dblink so that pgsql_fdw
> can use the name "postgresql_fdw" and "postgresql_fdw_validator".
> Though this post has had no response...
>
It seems to me what postgresql_fdw_validator() is doing looks like
a function to be named as "libpq_fdw_validator()".

How about your opinion? It will help this namespace conflicts.

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>