Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem

Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei.Kaigai@emea.nec.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-09-26T20:06:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2011/9/26 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes:
>> Sorry, are you saying the current (in other words, rte->security_barrier
>> stores the state of reloption) approach is not a good idea?
>
> Yes.  I think the same as Robert: the way to handle this is to store it
> in RelOptInfo for the duration of planning, and pull it from the
> catalogs during planner startup (cf plancat.c).
>
Hmm. If so, it seems to me worthwhile to investigate an alternative
approach that stores relation-id of the view on rte->relid if rtekind is
RTE_SUBQUERY and pull the "security_barrier" flag from the catalog
during planner stage.

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>