Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei.Kaigai@emea.nec.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-09-26T20:06:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2011/9/26 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes: >> Sorry, are you saying the current (in other words, rte->security_barrier >> stores the state of reloption) approach is not a good idea? > > Yes. I think the same as Robert: the way to handle this is to store it > in RelOptInfo for the duration of planning, and pull it from the > catalogs during planner startup (cf plancat.c). > Hmm. If so, it seems to me worthwhile to investigate an alternative approach that stores relation-id of the view on rte->relid if rtekind is RTE_SUBQUERY and pull the "security_barrier" flag from the catalog during planner stage. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>