Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem

Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Kohei.Kaigai@emea.nec.com, thom@linux.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-01-03T17:11:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

2011/12/23 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
>> I'd like the regression test on select_view test being committed also
>> to detect unexpected changed in the future. How about it?
>
> Can you resend that as a separate patch?  I remember there were some
> things I didn't like about it, but I don't remember what they were at
> the moment...
>
Sorry for this late response.

The attached one is patch of the regression test that checks scenario
of malicious function with/without security_barrier option.

I guess you concerned about that expected/select_views_1.out is
patched, not expected/select_views.out.
I'm not sure the reason why regression test script tries to make diff
between results/select_views and expected/select_views_1.out.

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>