Re: Ltree syntax improvement

Dear Tomas,

If the C part will be reviewed and considered mergeable, I'll update the
plpython tests.

On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 4:49 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This patch got mostly ignored since 2019-07 commitfest :-( The latest
> patch (sent by Nikita) does not apply because of a minor conflict in
> contrib/ltree/ltxtquery_io.c.
>
> I see the patch removes a small bit of ltree_plpython tests which would
> otherwise fail (with the "I don't know plpython" justification). Why not
> to instead update the tests to accept the new output? Or is it really
> the case that the case that we no longer need those tests?
>
> The patch also reworks some parts from "if" to "switch" statements. I
> agree switch statements are more readable, but maybe we should do this
> in two steps - first adopting the "switch" without changing the logic,
> and then making changes. But maybe that's an overkill.
>
>
> regards
>
> --
> Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>


-- 
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky