Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.

>
>
> Some of them are, yes.  However, they are also worded with the same
> format as some of the legit cases.  So they don't add any extra
> workload on the translation side as far as I recall, and I've been
> fond of the errdetail part to get a consistent style across the board.
> I'll double-check the whole a bit later, attached is the rest of them.
>
> Corey, any comments about these?
>

The wordings are fine, and I'm sorry I didn't word them as complete
sentences from the get-go.

Attached is a follow-on to Michael's most recent uncommitted patch,
changing the errors that I see as "impossible" to elogs. However, I agree
that they don't add significant workload to the translations, and most
input functions need to avoid any hard error returns lest they be called in
a soft-error context.