Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbench read-write tests.
Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>
From: Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-07-20T03:03:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi Andres, On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 1:21 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2018-01-24 00:06:44 +0530, Mithun Cy wrote: > > Server: > > ./postgres -c shared_buffers=8GB -N 200 -c min_wal_size=15GB -c > > max_wal_size=20GB -c checkpoint_timeout=900 -c > > maintenance_work_mem=1GB -c checkpoint_completion_target=0.9 & > > Which kernel & glibc version does this server have? > [mithun.cy@cthulhu ~]$ cat /proc/version Linux version 3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 (builder@kbuilder.dev.centos.org) (gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-16) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Fri Oct 20 20:32:50 UTC 2017 [mithun.cy@cthulhu ~]$ ldd --version ldd (GNU libc) 2.17 -- Thanks and Regards Mithun C Y EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Pad semaphores to avoid false sharing.
- 46201d603f9c 10.5 landed
- f2db5f3bb0b5 11.0 landed
- 2d3067595299 12.0 landed