Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility
Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com>
From: Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-27T14:43:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> > wrote: >> >> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> > Sure, PQping is useful for this very specific use case of seeing whether >> > the server has finished starting up. If someone came with a plausible >> >> Rename the utility to pg_isready? > > +1, the current version of the patch is already fitted for that and would > not need extra options like the number of packages sent. I am 100% fine with this. I can make this change tomorrow. > -- > Michael Paquier > http://michael.otacoo.com Sorry I haven't jumped in on this thread more, I have limited connectivity where I am.