Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility

Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com>

From: Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-27T14:43:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
> wrote:
>>
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> > Sure, PQping is useful for this very specific use case of seeing whether
>> > the server has finished starting up.  If someone came with a plausible
>>
>> Rename the utility to pg_isready?
>
> +1, the current version of the patch is already fitted for that and would
> not need extra options like the number of packages sent.

I am 100% fine with this. I can make this change tomorrow.

> --
> Michael Paquier
> http://michael.otacoo.com

Sorry I haven't jumped in on this thread more, I have limited
connectivity where I am.