Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 3:35 PM Jacob Champion <
jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> I've been poking at the partial token logic. The json_errdetail() bug
> mentioned upthread (e.g. for an invalid input `[12zz]` and small chunk
> size) seems to be due to the disconnection between the "main" lex
> instance and the dummy_lex that's created from it. The dummy_lex
> contains all the information about the failed token, which is
> discarded upon an error return:
>
> > partial_result = json_lex(&dummy_lex);
> > if (partial_result != JSON_SUCCESS)
> >     return partial_result;
>
> In these situations, there's an additional logical error:
> lex->token_start is pointing to a spot in the string after
> lex->token_terminator, which breaks an invariant that will mess up
> later pointer math. Nothing appears to be setting lex->token_start to
> point into the partial token buffer until _after_ the partial token is
> successfully lexed, which doesn't seem right -- in addition to the
> pointer math problems, if a previous chunk was freed (or on a stale
> stack frame), lex->token_start will still be pointing off into space.
> Similarly, wherever we set token_terminator, we need to know that
> token_start is pointing into the same buffer.
>
> Determining the end of a token is now done in two separate places
> between the partial- and full-lexer code paths, which is giving me a
> little heartburn. I'm concerned that those could drift apart, and if
> the two disagree on where to end a token, we could lose data into the
> partial token buffer in a way that would be really hard to debug. Is
> there a way to combine them?
>


Not very easily. But I think and hope I've fixed the issue you've
identified above about returning before lex->token_start is properly set.

 Attached is a new set of patches that does that and is updated for the
json_errdetaiil() changes.

cheers

andrew