Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>,
Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-12-10T10:24:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix regression test failure when wal_level is set to minimal.
- 0de5f0d869d1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.
- 67c20979ce72 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Disallow server start with sync_replication_slots = on and wal_level < logical.
- 12da45742cfd 19 (unreleased) cited
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 2:07 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > Another thing I noticed in v34 is that, due to the change in > show_effective_wal_level(), a standby now reports effective_wal_level > = 'logical' when wal_level = 'logical' is set on the standby, even if > the primary has effective_wal_level='replica'. Is this change in > behavior intentional? > > It seems to contradict the documented behavior as well: > > + On standby servers, <varname>effective_wal_level</varname> matches > + the value of <varname>effective_wal_level</varname> from the most > + upstream server in the replication chain. No, it should be fixed. Thank you for pointing this out. > ~~ > > I see that XLogLogicalInfoXactCache is removed, but it is still > referenced at few places: > > +extern PGDLLEXPORT int XLogLogicalInfoXactCache; > > +/* > + * A process local cache of LogicalDecodingCtl->xlog_logical_info. This is > + * initialized at process startup time, and could be updated when absorbing > + * the process barrier signal in ProcessBarrierUpdateXLogLogicalInfo(). > + * See the comments of XLogLogicalInfoXactCache too for details of how this > + * cache value is used within a transaction. > + */ Will fix. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com