Re: Fix pg_upgrade to detect invalid logical replication slots on PG19
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Cc: Lakshmi N <lakshmin.jhs@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-22T17:01:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 1:02 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 9:27 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 2:28 PM Lakshmi N <lakshmin.jhs@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Hackers, > > > > > > The PG19-optimized slot catchup query uses a CTE that filters on > > > invalidation_reason IS NULL, then cross-joins it with the main slot > > > query. When ALL logical slots in a database are invalid, the CTE > > > returns zero rows, and the cross join produces an empty result set. > > > This causes pg_upgrade to silently skip those slots entirely -- > > > neither detecting them as invalid (which should block the upgrade) > > > nor attempting to migrate them. > > > > > > The pre-PG19 query path does not have this problem because it queries > > > pg_replication_slots directly without a cross join. This may not impact > > > upgrade to PG19 but will change the behavior for PG20 upgrade. > > Thank you for the report. > > > > > > > Fix by changing the cross join to a LEFT JOIN, > > > so that invalid slots still appear in the result set with NULL > > > caught_up values. > > > > > > > I agree with the problem here. > > I've confirmed the bug and the patch fixes it. The patch looks good to > me, so I'm going to push it tomorrow barring any objections. Pushed. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_upgrade: Fix detection of invalid logical replication slots.
- e471dc591219 19 (unreleased) landed