Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 1:58 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 6:46 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 12:51 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > BTW I've tested the following switch/fail-back scenario but it seems > > > > not to work fine. Am I missing something? > > > > > > > > Setup: > > > > node1 is the primary, node2 is the physical standby for node1, and > > > > node3 is the subscriber connecting to node1. > > > > > > > > Steps: > > > > 1. [node1]: create a table and a publication for the table. > > > > 2. [node2]: set enable_syncslot = on and start (to receive WALs from node1). > > > > 3. [node3]: create a subscription with failover = true for the publication. > > > > 4. [node2]: promote to the new standby. > > > > 5. [node3]: alter subscription to connect the new primary, node2. > > > > 6. [node1]: stop, set enable_syncslot = on (and other required > > > > parameters), then start as a new standby. > > > > > > > > Then I got the error "exiting from slot synchronization because same > > > > name slot "test_sub" already exists on the standby". > > > > > > > > The logical replication slot that was created on the old primary > > > > (node1) has been synchronized to the old standby (node2). Therefore on > > > > node2, the slot's "synced" field is true. However, once node1 starts > > > > as the new standby with slot synchronization, the slotsync worker > > > > cannot synchronize the slot because the slot's "synced" field on the > > > > primary is false. > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, we avoided doing anything in this case because the user could > > > have manually created another slot with the same name on standby. > > > Unlike WAL slots can be modified on standby as we allow decoding on > > > standby, so we can't allow to overwrite the existing slots. We won't > > > be able to distinguish whether the existing slot was a slot that the > > > user wants to sync with primary or a slot created on standby to > > > perform decoding. I think in this case user first needs to drop the > > > slot on new standby. > > > > Yes, but if we do a switch-back further (i.e. in above case, node1 > > backs to the primary again and node becomes the standby again), the > > user doesn't need to remove failover slots since they are already > > marked as "synced". > > But, I think in this case node-2's timeline will be ahead of node-1, > so will we be able to make node-2 follow node-1 again without any > additional steps? One thing is not clear to me after promotion the > timeline changes in WAL, so the locations in slots will be as per new > timelines, after that will it be safe to sync slots from the new > primary to old-primary? In order for node-1 to go back to the primary again, it needs to be promoted. That is, the node-1's timeline increments and node-2 follows node-1. > > In general, I think after failover, we recommend running pg_rewind if > the old primary has to follow the new primary to account for > divergence in WAL. So, not sure we can safely start syncing slots in > old-primary from new-primary, consider that in the new primary, the > same name slot may have dropped/re-created multiple times. Right. And I missed the point that all replication slots are removed after pg_rewind. It would not be a problem in a failover case. But probably we still need to consider a switchover cas (i.e. switch roles with clean shutdowns) since it doesn't require to run pg_rewind? > We can > probably reset all the fields of the existing slot the first time > syncing for an existing slot or do something like that but I think it > would be better to just re-create the slot. > > > > I wonder if we could do something automatically to > > reduce the user's operation. > > One possibility is that we forcefully drop/re-create the slot or > directly overwrite the slot contents but that would probably be better > done via some GUC or slot-level parameter. I feel we should leave this > for another day, for the first version, we can document that an error > will occur if the same name slots on standby exist, so users need to > ensure that there shouldn't be an existing same name slots on standby > before sync. > Hmm, I'm afraid it might not be user-friendly. But probably we can leave it for now as it's not impossible. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Doc: Add the new section "Logical Replication Failover".
- b560a98a17ae 17.0 landed
-
Fix the review comments and a bug in the slot sync code.
- 3741f2a09d52 17.0 landed
-
Fix a test in failover slots regression test.
- 7e85d1c75f29 17.0 landed
-
Fix the intermittent buildfarm failures in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.
- 6f3d8d5e7cc2 17.0 landed
-
Split XLogCtl->LogwrtResult into separate struct members
- c9920a9068ea 17.0 cited
-
Ensure that the sync slots reach a consistent state after promotion without losing data.
- 2ec005b4e297 17.0 landed
-
Introduce a new GUC 'standby_slot_names'.
- bf279ddd1c28 17.0 landed
-
Fix BF failure introduced by commit b3f6b14cf4.
- def0ce337068 17.0 landed
-
Fixups for commit 93db6cbda0.
- b3f6b14cf48f 17.0 landed
-
Fix BF failure in commit 93db6cbda0.
- d13ff82319cc 17.0 landed
-
Add a new slot sync worker to synchronize logical slots.
- 93db6cbda037 17.0 landed
-
Improve ERROR/LOG messages added by commits ddd5f4f54a and 7a424ece48.
- 801792e528d6 17.0 landed
-
Disable autovacuum on primary in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync test.
- b7bdade6a42f 17.0 landed
-
Fix the incorrect format specifier used in commit 7a424ece48.
- b987be39c3c7 17.0 landed
-
Change the LOG level in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.pl to DEBUG2.
- d9e225f275b7 17.0 landed
-
Add more LOG and DEBUG messages for slot synchronization.
- 7a424ece4828 17.0 landed
-
Another try to fix BF failure introduced in commit ddd5f4f54a.
- 9bc1eee988c3 17.0 landed
-
Fix BF introduced in commit ddd5f4f54a.
- bd8fc1677b88 17.0 landed
-
Add a slot synchronization function.
- ddd5f4f54a02 17.0 landed
-
Clean-ups for 776621a5e4 and 7329240437.
- 22f7e61a6330 17.0 landed
-
Enhance libpqrcv APIs to support slot synchronization.
- dafbfed9efbe 17.0 landed
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 landed
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 landed
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 landed
-
Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.
- 14dd0f27d7cd 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Allow upgrades to preserve the full subscription's state.
- 9a17be1e244a 17.0 cited
-
Add support for incremental backup.
- dc212340058b 17.0 cited
-
Simplify some logic in CreateReplicationSlot()
- e83aa9f92fdd 17.0 cited
-
Fix uninitialized access to InitialRunningXacts during decoding after ERROR.
- c7256e6564fa 15.5 cited
-
Flexible options for CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT.
- 0266e98c6b86 15.0 cited
-
Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.
- 11da97024abb 14.0 cited
-
Fix oldest xmin and LSN computation across repslots after advancing
- b48df818dcbd 14.0 cited
-
Require C99 (and thus MSCV 2013 upwards).
- d9dd406fe281 12.0 cited