Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
To: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-01-04T00:32:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix regression test failure when wal_level is set to minimal.
- 0de5f0d869d1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.
- 67c20979ce72 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Disallow server start with sync_replication_slots = on and wal_level < logical.
- 12da45742cfd 19 (unreleased) cited
On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 6:31 AM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2025, at 10:14 AM, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > > If we don't want to force wal_level = logical to enable logical decoding (your > second idea) then I think that it would be better to "hide" everything behind > logical replication slot creation / deletion. That would mean that having at > least one logical replication slot created would be synonym to "activate logical > decoding" and zero logical replication slot created would be synonym to "deactivate > logical decoding". > > > I like this idea. The logical replication slot existence already has the > required protections and guarantees (no running transactions from the past while > creating) for logical decoding. I agree that it's better behavior. > > Having said that, you are basically folding 'logical' machinery into 'replica'. > The 'logical' option can still exists but it will be less attractive because it > increases the WAL volume even if you are not using logical replication. I don't > know if the current 'logical' behavior (WAL records for logical decoding even > if there is no active logical replication) has any use case (maybe someone > inspects these extra records for analysis) but one suggestion (separate patch) > is to make 'logical' synonymous with the new 'replica' behavior (logical > decoding capability). This opens the door to remove 'logical' in future > releases (accepted as synonym but not documented). To enable the logical decoding automatically when the first slot is created, probably we need to do something like: 1. enable WAL-logging logical info. 2. wait for all running transactions to finish. 3. enable logical decoding, and write a XLOG_LOGICAL_DECODING_STATUS record, 4. create a logical slot 4-1. reserve the WAL and write an XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS record. 4-2. wait for all transactions in the XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS record to finish during creating the initial snapshot. That is, we could need to wait for different sets of transactions to finish (at 2 and 4-2). Which could surprise users since the first slot creation could have users wait for a longer time. Using the 'logical' level would avoid such waits. Also, if we make the 'logical' level synonymous with the new 'replica' behavior, we need to adjust regression tests as well. In some regression tests (e.g., ondisk_startup.spec), we create a logical slot while a transaction is concurrently running. We expect we wait for the concurrent transaction during the slot creation but with the above algorithm, we would wait for them to activate logical decoding. So I agree that making the 'logical' level synonymous with the new 'replica' behavior is done in a separate patch. It would be a good start to implement the new 'replica' level behavior. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com