Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart

Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-10-27T19:20:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix regression test failure when wal_level is set to minimal.

  2. Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.

  3. Disallow server start with sync_replication_slots = on and wal_level < logical.

On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 5:54 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sawada.
>
> A couple of comments for v22-0001.
>
> ======
>
> 1.
> + /*
> + * We don't need this warning message when wal_level >= 'replica' since
> + * logical decoding is automatically enabled up on a logical slot
> + * creation.
> + */
> + if (wal_level == WAL_LEVEL_MINIMAL)
>   ereport(WARNING,
>   (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
> - errmsg("\"wal_level\" is insufficient to publish logical changes"),
> - errhint("Set \"wal_level\" to \"logical\" before creating subscriptions.")));
> + errmsg("logical decoding must be enabled to publish logical changes"),
> + errhint("Before creating subscriptions, set \"wal_level\" >=
> \"logical\" or create a logical replication slot when \"wal_level\" =
> \"replica\".")));
>
> 1a.
> Sorry, for repeating the same question about the HINT message, but
> AFAICT I did not yet notice any reply to directly reject or address my
> question.
>
> Basically, I felt the errhint part that says "...or create a logical
> replication slot when wal_level = replica." is overkill, because
> creating the subscription will do that anyway.
> In other words, we don't need to tell the user this is needed "Before
> creating subscriptions". So, I thought the only requirement to be able
> to publish a subscription is for wal_level >= replica.
>
> SUGGESTION
> errhint("Before creating subscriptions, set \"wal_level\" >= \"replica\".")
>

Agreed with the suggested change.

> ~~
>
> 1b.
> Since wal_level needs to be >= replica, the condition for this WARNING
> might be better to be written as:
> if (wal_level < WAL_LEVEL_REPLICA)

Changed.

>
> ~~
>
> 1c.
> Now that the condition for this warning was slightly changed, there
> seems to be no test case anymore for this WARNING. Isn't it better to
> still have a test case for this?

There are other tests covering this path. For instance, we check the
WARNING message in 001_rep_changes.pl.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com