Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
To: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran@gmail.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-21T01:15:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:11 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 4/10/18 6:14 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>> On 16 January 2018 at 06:21, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:40:43AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9 January 2018 at 04:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> We're not talking about standbys, so the message is incorrect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, I understood. How about "\"%s\"  has now caught up with upstream
>>>>>> server"?
>>>>>
>>>>> +1.
>>>>
>>>> upstream is what I would have suggested, so +1 here also.
>>>>
>>>> Will commit.
>>>
>>> ping?
>>>
>>
>> Should I add this item to "Older Bugs" of the open item since we
>> regarded it as a bug?
>
> I'm going to reclassify this as a bug since everyone seems to agree it
> is one.

I've added this to Open Items so as not to forget.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


Commits

  1. Make logical WAL sender report streaming state appropriately