Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha.takeshi@jp.fujitsu.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Date: 2018-04-06T01:52:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone, fixes are pushed except nodeMerge.c, I don't wish to
> increase entropy around MERGE patch :)
>

Thank you!

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


Commits

  1. Fix upper limit for vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor

  2. Increase upper limit for vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor

  3. Fixes for vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor GUC option

  4. Skip full index scan during cleanup of B-tree indexes when possible