Re: Table refer leak in logical replication

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:15 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > WARNING: relcache reference leak: relation "xxx" not closed.
> >
> > Example of the procedure:
> > ------publisher------
> > create table test (a int primary key);
> > create publication pub for table test;
> >
> > ------subscriber------
> > create table test (a int primary key);
> > create subscription sub connection 'dbname=postgres' publication pub;
> > create function funcA() returns trigger as $$ begin return null; end; $$ language
> > plpgsql; create trigger my_trig after insert or update or delete on test for each
> > row execute procedure funcA(); alter table test enable replica trigger my_trig;
> >
> > ------publisher------
> > insert into test values (6);
> >
> > It seems an issue about reference leak. Anyone can fix this?
>
> It seems ExecGetTriggerResultRel will reopen the target table because it cannot find an existing one.
> Storing the opened table in estate->es_opened_result_relations seems solves the problem.

It seems like commit 1375422c is related to this bug. The commit
introduced a new function ExecInitResultRelation() that sets both
estate->es_result_relations and estate->es_opened_result_relations. I
think it's better to use ExecInitResultRelation() rather than directly
setting estate->es_opened_result_relations. It might be better to do
that in create_estate_for_relation() though. Please find an attached
patch.

Since this issue happens on only HEAD and it seems an oversight of
commit 1375422c, I don't think regression tests for this are
essential.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/