Re: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-09-14T09:22:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 01:14:12AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: >> Some customer wants to change the setting per standby, i.e., a shorter >> timeout for a standby in the same region to enable faster detection >> failure and failover, and a longer timeout for a standby in the remote >> region (for disaster recovery) to avoid mis-judging its health. > > This argument is sensible. > >> The current PGC_HUP allows to change the setting by editing >> postgresql.conf or ALTER SYSTEM and then sending SIGHUP to a specific >> walsender. But that's not easy to use. The user has to do it upon >> every switchover and failover. >> >> With PGC_BACKEND, the user would be able to tune the timeout as follows: >> >> [recovery.conf] >> primary_conninfo = '... options=''-c wal_sender_timeout=60000'' ...' >> >> With PGC_USERSET, the user would be able to use different user >> accounts for each standby, and tune the setting as follows: >> >> ALTER USER repluser_remote SET wal_sender_timeout = 60000; > > It seems to me that switching to PGC_BACKENDwould cover already all the > use-cases you are mentioning, as at the end one would just want to > adjust the WAL sender timeout on a connection basis depending on the > geographical location of the receiver and the latency between primary > and standby. +1 for PGC_BACKEND. It looks enough for most use cases. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
Commits
-
Make GUC wal_sender_timeout user-settable
- db361db2fce7 12.0 landed