Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:33 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 8:25 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've reviewed the v91 patch. Here are random comments:
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> > ---
> > /*
> > * Checks the remote server info.
> > *
> > - * We ensure that the 'primary_slot_name' exists on the remote server and the
> > - * remote server is not a standby node.
> > + * Check whether we are a cascading standby. For non-cascading standbys, it
> > + * also ensures that the 'primary_slot_name' exists on the remote server.
> > */
> >
> > IIUC what the validate_remote_info() does doesn't not change by this
> > patch, so the previous comment seems to be clearer to me.
> >
> > ---
> > if (remote_in_recovery)
> > + {
> > + /*
> > + * If we are a cascading standby, no need to check further for
> > + * 'primary_slot_name'.
> > + */
> > ereport(ERROR,
> > errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
> > errmsg("cannot synchronize replication slots from a
> > standby server"));
> > + }
> > + else
> > + {
> > + bool primary_slot_valid;
> >
> > - primary_slot_valid = DatumGetBool(slot_getattr(tupslot, 2, &isnull));
> > - Assert(!isnull);
> > + primary_slot_valid = DatumGetBool(slot_getattr(tupslot, 2, &isnull));
> > + Assert(!isnull);
> >
> > - if (!primary_slot_valid)
> > - ereport(ERROR,
> > - errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> > - errmsg("bad configuration for slot synchronization"),
> > - /* translator: second %s is a GUC variable name */
> > - errdetail("The replication slot \"%s\" specified by
> > \"%s\" does not exist on the primary server.",
> > - PrimarySlotName, "primary_slot_name"));
> > + if (!primary_slot_valid)
> > + ereport(ERROR,
> > + errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> > + errmsg("bad configuration for slot synchronization"),
> > + /* translator: second %s is a GUC variable name */
> > + errdetail("The replication slot \"%s\" specified
> > by \"%s\" does not exist on the primary server.",
> > + PrimarySlotName, "primary_slot_name"));
> > + }
> >
> > I think it's a refactoring rather than changes required by the
> > slotsync worker. We can do that in a separate patch but why do we need
> > this change in the first place?
>
> In v90, this refactoring was made due to the fact that
> validate_remote_info() was supposed to behave differently for SQL
> function and slot-sync worker. SQL-function was supposed to ERROR out
> while the worker was supposed to LOG and become no-op. And thus the
> change was needed. In v91, we made this functionality same i.e. both
> sql function and worker will error out but missed to remove this
> refactoring. Thanks for catching this, I will revert it in the next
> version. To match the refactoring, I made the comment change too, will
> revert that as well.
>
> > ---
> > + ValidateSlotSyncParams(ERROR);
> > +
> > /* Load the libpq-specific functions */
> > load_file("libpqwalreceiver", false);
> >
> > - ValidateSlotSyncParams();
> > + (void) CheckDbnameInConninfo();
> >
> > Is there any reason why we move where to check the parameters?
>
> Earlier DBname verification was done inside ValidateSlotSyncParams()
> and thus it was needed to load 'libpqwalreceiver' before we call this
> function. Now we have moved dbname verification in a separate call and
> thus the above order got changed. ValidateSlotSyncParams() is a common
> function used by SQL function and worker. Earlier slot sync worker was
> checking all the GUCs after starting up and was exiting each time any
> GUC was invalid. It was suggested that it would be better to check the
> GUCs before starting the slot sync worker in the postmaster itself,
> making the ValidateSlotSyncParams() move to postmaster (see
> SlotSyncWorkerAllowed). But it was not a good idea to load libpq in
> postmaster and thus we moved libpq related verification out of
> ValidateSlotSyncParams(). This resulted in the above change. I hope
> it answers your query.
Thank you for the explanation. It makes sense to me to move the check.
As for ValidateSlotSyncParams() called by SlotSyncWorkerAllowed(), I
have two comments:
1. The error messages are not very descriptive and seem not to match
other messages the postmaster says. When starting the standby server
with misconfiguration about the slotsync, I got the following messages
from the postmaster:
2024-02-20 17:01:16.356 JST [456741] LOG: database system is ready to
accept read-only connections
2024-02-20 17:01:16.358 JST [456741] LOG: bad configuration for slot
synchronization
2024-02-20 17:01:16.358 JST [456741] HINT: "hot_standby_feedback"
must be enabled.
It says "bad configuration" but is still working, and does not say
further information such as whether it skipped to start the slotsync
worker etc. I think these messages could work for the slotsync worker
but we might want to have more descriptive messages for the
postmaster. For example, "skipped starting slot sync worker because
hot_standby_feedback is disabled".
2. If the wal_level is not logical, the server will need to restart
anyway to change the wal_level and have the slotsync worker work. Does
it make sense to have the postmaster exit if the wal_level is not
logical and sync_replication_slots is enabled? For instance, we have
similar checks in PostmsaterMain():
if (summarize_wal && wal_level == WAL_LEVEL_MINIMAL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errmsg("WAL cannot be summarized when wal_level is
\"minimal\"")));
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Doc: Add the new section "Logical Replication Failover".
- b560a98a17ae 17.0 landed
-
Fix the review comments and a bug in the slot sync code.
- 3741f2a09d52 17.0 landed
-
Fix a test in failover slots regression test.
- 7e85d1c75f29 17.0 landed
-
Fix the intermittent buildfarm failures in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.
- 6f3d8d5e7cc2 17.0 landed
-
Split XLogCtl->LogwrtResult into separate struct members
- c9920a9068ea 17.0 cited
-
Ensure that the sync slots reach a consistent state after promotion without losing data.
- 2ec005b4e297 17.0 landed
-
Introduce a new GUC 'standby_slot_names'.
- bf279ddd1c28 17.0 landed
-
Fix BF failure introduced by commit b3f6b14cf4.
- def0ce337068 17.0 landed
-
Fixups for commit 93db6cbda0.
- b3f6b14cf48f 17.0 landed
-
Fix BF failure in commit 93db6cbda0.
- d13ff82319cc 17.0 landed
-
Add a new slot sync worker to synchronize logical slots.
- 93db6cbda037 17.0 landed
-
Improve ERROR/LOG messages added by commits ddd5f4f54a and 7a424ece48.
- 801792e528d6 17.0 landed
-
Disable autovacuum on primary in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync test.
- b7bdade6a42f 17.0 landed
-
Fix the incorrect format specifier used in commit 7a424ece48.
- b987be39c3c7 17.0 landed
-
Change the LOG level in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.pl to DEBUG2.
- d9e225f275b7 17.0 landed
-
Add more LOG and DEBUG messages for slot synchronization.
- 7a424ece4828 17.0 landed
-
Another try to fix BF failure introduced in commit ddd5f4f54a.
- 9bc1eee988c3 17.0 landed
-
Fix BF introduced in commit ddd5f4f54a.
- bd8fc1677b88 17.0 landed
-
Add a slot synchronization function.
- ddd5f4f54a02 17.0 landed
-
Clean-ups for 776621a5e4 and 7329240437.
- 22f7e61a6330 17.0 landed
-
Enhance libpqrcv APIs to support slot synchronization.
- dafbfed9efbe 17.0 landed
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 landed
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 landed
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 landed
-
Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.
- 14dd0f27d7cd 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Allow upgrades to preserve the full subscription's state.
- 9a17be1e244a 17.0 cited
-
Add support for incremental backup.
- dc212340058b 17.0 cited
-
Simplify some logic in CreateReplicationSlot()
- e83aa9f92fdd 17.0 cited
-
Fix uninitialized access to InitialRunningXacts during decoding after ERROR.
- c7256e6564fa 15.5 cited
-
Flexible options for CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT.
- 0266e98c6b86 15.0 cited
-
Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.
- 11da97024abb 14.0 cited
-
Fix oldest xmin and LSN computation across repslots after advancing
- b48df818dcbd 14.0 cited
-
Require C99 (and thus MSCV 2013 upwards).
- d9dd406fe281 12.0 cited