Thread

Commits

  1. Remove obsolete comment in reorderbuffer.h.

  2. Use the new "Slab" context for some allocations in reorderbuffer.h.

  1. Remove obsolete comment in reorderbuffer.h

    Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> — 2024-10-12T00:11:47Z

    Hi,
    
    I realized an obsolete comment in the definition of ReorderBufferTXN.
    
    Commit 9fab40ad32e changed ReorderBuffer to use Slab Context for
    allocating ReorderBufferTXN entries instead of using a caching
    mechanism, so the txn->node is no longer used as an element of the
    list of preallocated ReorderBufferTXNs.
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Masahiko Sawada
    Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
    
  2. Re: Remove obsolete comment in reorderbuffer.h

    Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> — 2024-10-14T03:57:08Z

    On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 5:42 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > I realized an obsolete comment in the definition of ReorderBufferTXN.
    >
    > Commit 9fab40ad32e changed ReorderBuffer to use Slab Context for
    > allocating ReorderBufferTXN entries instead of using a caching
    > mechanism, so the txn->node is no longer used as an element of the
    > list of preallocated ReorderBufferTXNs.
    >
    
    I agree, and your patch looks good to me.
    
    -- 
    With Regards,
    Amit Kapila.
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Remove obsolete comment in reorderbuffer.h

    Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> — 2024-10-14T16:54:25Z

    On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 8:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 5:42 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
    > >
    > > I realized an obsolete comment in the definition of ReorderBufferTXN.
    > >
    > > Commit 9fab40ad32e changed ReorderBuffer to use Slab Context for
    > > allocating ReorderBufferTXN entries instead of using a caching
    > > mechanism, so the txn->node is no longer used as an element of the
    > > list of preallocated ReorderBufferTXNs.
    > >
    >
    > I agree, and your patch looks good to me.
    
    Thank you for reviewing the patch. Pushed.
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Masahiko Sawada
    Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com