Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:27 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 7:16 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> >
> > > On 28 Nov 2023, at 03:00, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:40 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 27 Nov 2023, at 14:06, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Is it true that we can modify the timeout after creating
> > >>> BackgroundPsql object? If so, it seems we don't need to introduce the
> > >>> new timeout argument. But how?
> > >>
> > >> I can't remember if that's leftovers that incorrectly remains from an earlier
> > >> version of the BackgroundPsql work, or if it's a very bad explanation of
> > >> ->set_query_timer_restart().  The timeout will use the timeout_default value
> > >> and that cannot be overridden, it can only be reset per query.
> > >
> > > Thank you for confirming this. I see there is the same problem also in
> > > interactive_psql(). So I've attached the 0001 patch to fix these
> > > documentation issues.
> >
> > -A default timeout of $PostgreSQL::Test::Utils::timeout_default is set up,
> > -which can be modified later.
> > +A default timeout of $PostgreSQL::Test::Utils::timeout_default is set up.
> >
> > Since it cannot be modified, I think we should just say "A timeout of .." and
> > call it a default timeout.  This obviously only matters for the backpatch since
> > the sentence is removed in 0002.
>
> Agreed.
>
> I've attached new version patches (0002 and 0003 are unchanged except
> for the commit message). I'll push them, barring any objections.
>

Pushed.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com