Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)

Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-12-20T19:23:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 6:31 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:27:04AM -0800, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 6:26 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >> v2 does not have these weaknesses by design.
> >
> > I agree that v2 is better than v3 in terms of that.
>
> Okay.  In terms of the backbranches, would you prefer that I handle
> this patch myself as I have done the HEAD part?  This would need a
> second, closer, review but I could do that at the beginning of next
> week.

Thanks. Please proceed with this fix as you've already fixed the HEAD part.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



Commits

  1. Fix memory leak in pgoutput with relation attribute map

  2. Fix memory leak in pgoutput with publication list cache

  3. Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.