Re: Control your disk usage in PG: Introduction to Disk Quota Extension
Xing Guo <higuoxing@gmail.com>
From: Xing Guo <higuoxing@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Haozhou Wang <hawang@pivotal.io>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Hubert Zhang <hzhang@pivotal.io>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@pivotal.io>
Date: 2024-02-26T11:42:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v8-0001-Add-smgr-hooks-to-extend-the-logic-of-storage-man.patch (text/x-patch) patch v8-0001
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 7:27 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > On 1 Jul 2020, at 10:36, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> >
> >> On 27 Mar 2020, at 11:22, Haozhou Wang <hawang@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> >> We rebased this patch with the newest master.
> >
> > This patch now fails to build according to Travis:
> >
> > smgr.c: In function ‘smgrtruncate’:
> > smgr.c:578:47: error: passing argument 4 of ‘smgrtruncate_hook’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
> > (*smgrtruncate_hook)(reln, forknum, nforks, nblocks);
> > ^
> > smgr.c:578:47: note: expected ‘BlockNumber {aka unsigned int}’ but argument is of type ‘BlockNumber * {aka unsigned int *}’
> >
> >
> > The warning is also present in the Windows build:
> >
> > src/backend/storage/smgr/smgr.c(578): warning C4047: 'function' : 'BlockNumber' differs in levels of indirection from 'BlockNumber *' [C:\projects\postgresql\postgres.vcxproj]
> > src/backend/storage/smgr/smgr.c(578): warning C4024: 'smgrtruncate_hook' : different types for formal and actual parameter 4 [C:\projects\postgresql\postgres.vcxproj]
> > 2 Warning(s)
> >
> > Marking the patch as Waiting for Author.
>
> As the thread has stalled and the above compilation issue hasn't been
> addressed, I'm marking this entry Returned with Feedback. Feel free to open a
> new entry when there is a fixed patch.
Hi,
Looks that many hackers are happy with the original patch except that
the original patch needs a simple rebase, though it has been 3 years.
Shall we push forward this patch so that it can benefit extensions not
only diskquota?
The attachment is a rebased version of the original patch.
>
> cheers ./daniel
>
>
>