Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Amit Khandekar <amit.khandekar@enterprisedb.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-09T22:48:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:

> New patch attached.

And bit-rotted less than 24 hours later by fcec6caa.

New patch attached just to fix bit-rot.

That conflicting patch might be a candidate to merge into the new
Ephemeral Named Relation provided by my patch, for more flexibility
and extensibility...

-- 
Kevin Grittner

Commits

  1. Don't permit transition tables with TRUNCATE triggers.

  2. Pass EXEC_FLAG_REWIND when initializing a tuplestore scan.

  3. Faster expression evaluation and targetlist projection.

  4. Remove obsoleted code relating to targetlist SRF evaluation.

  5. Implement syntax for transition tables in AFTER triggers.