Thread

Fwd: Automating Failover Resync & Re-Attach in pgpool2

VASUKI M <vasukim1992002@gmail.com> — 2025-10-23T07:13:04Z

Hi Bo,

Thank you very much for your clarification and the helpful links on
follow_primary_command and auto_failback. I went through those sections in
the documentation, and I now understand that Pgpool-II can automatically
follow the new primary and reattach a standby node once it becomes
available again.

However, my idea was aimed at handling cases where the *old primary
diverges in timeline or LSN* after a failover — for example, when the new
primary executes additional writes before the old primary rejoins. In such
cases, the existing auto-failback or follow-primary mechanisms can’t
directly reattach the old node because its data is no longer in sync with
the current primary.

To address that, I was exploring a built-in *auto-resync enhancement* where
Pgpool-II could internally perform the following before reattaching:

   1.

   *Detect timeline mismatch* between the new primary and the returning
   node.
   2.

   *Automatically run pg_rewind* (or WAL-based replay) to synchronize the
   old node’s data directory.
   3.

   *Restart and reattach the node* to the pool automatically once the
   resync is complete.

This would essentially extend the existing auto_failback behavior to
include *automated resynchronization*, reducing manual intervention and
ensuring consistent cluster recovery even in timeline divergence scenarios.

I’m thinking of something like a new configuration section in pgpool.conf:

auto_resync = on
resync_method = 'pg_rewind'
resync_user = 'replicator'

The feature could hook into the existing failback workflow (perhaps in
failover.c or recovery.c), so that Pgpool performs resync + reattach
seamlessly when the failed node returns.

Would this be something the Pgpool team would consider as an enhancement?

Thanks again for your time and guidance.

Best regards,
*Vasuki M*
CDAC, Chennai
vasukim1992002@gmail.com

On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 at 13:30, Bo Peng <pengbo@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your question.
>
> > While working with PostgreSQL failover scenarios, I noticed that the
> process of re-attaching a standby node
> > after a failover can be somewhat manual and prone to delays, especially
> in production environments.
>
> After a failover, the standby nodes can be automatically attached to the
> new primary by setting "follow_primary_command".
>
>
> https://www.pgpool.net/docs/latest/en/html/runtime-config-failover.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-FAILOVER-SETTINGS
>
> You can also automatically reattach a failed standby node by setting
> "auto_failback = on".
>
>
> https://www.pgpool.net/docs/latest/ja/html/runtime-config-failover.html#GUC-AUTO-FAILBACK
>
> ---
> Bo Peng <pengbo@sraoss.co.jp>
> SRA OSS K.K.
> TEL: 03-5979-2701 FAX: 03-5979-2702
> Mobile: 080-7752-0749
> URL: https://www.sraoss.co.jp/
>
>
> ________________________________________
> 差出人: VASUKI M <vasukim1992002@gmail.com>
> 送信: 2025 年 10 月 10 日 (金曜日) 21:17
> 宛先: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
> Cc: bharatdb@cdac.in <bharatdb@cdac.in>;
> pgpool-general@lists.postgresql.org <pgpool-general@lists.postgresql.org>
> 件名: Automating Failover Resync & Re-Attach in pgpool2
>
> Dear PostgreSQL and Pgpool Communities,While working with PostgreSQL
> failover scenarios, I noticed that the process of re-attaching a standby
> node after a failover can be somewhat manual and prone to delays,
> especially in production environments.I explored automating this process
> using a combination of pg_rewind and WAL replay, which allows a standby
> node to resynchronize and re-attach to the primary automatically after a
> failover. This could reduce downtime and simplify management of failover
> nodes in high-availability setups.Automatically resynchronize after
> failoverReduce downtime and ensure quicker recoveryMinimize manual
> operations and errorsMaintain consistent cluster state with less
> administrative overheadI believe that integrating such an automated resync
> and re-attach feature into Pgpool-II could be very valuable for PostgreSQL
> users, potentially as an enhancement in a future release.I wanted to share
> this idea with the community to get feedback, suggestions, or any pointers
> on existing work that may align with this. I am happy to contribute more
> details