Horton
Menu

Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation

Daniel Farina <daniel@fdr.io>

View thread
From: Daniel Farina <daniel@fdr.io>
To: samthakur74 <samthakur74@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-09-20T08:31:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Daniel Farina <daniel@fdr.io> wrote:
> I think the n-call underestimation propagation may not be quite precise for
> various detailed reasons (having to do with 'sticky' queries) and to make it
> precise is probably more work than it's worth.  And, on more reflection, I'm
> also having a hard time imaging people intuiting that value usefully.  So,
> here's a version removing that.

I forgot about removal of the relevant SGML, amended here in v6.

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Improve management of "sticky" entries in contrib/pg_stat_statements.