Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> But, the faster rowbuf method is a generally incompatible way of
> dealing with data vs current libpq -- this is bad.  If it's truly
> impossible to get those benefits without bypassing result API that
> then I remove my objection on the grounds it's optional behavior (my
> gut tells me it is possible though).

Um, please clarify what are you talking about here?

What is the incompatibility of PGresult from branch 1?

-- 
marko