Thread

  1. Re: Add wait events for server logging destination writes

    Kirk Wolak <wolakk@gmail.com> — 2026-05-31T16:53:09Z

    On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 4:50 AM 신성준 <shinsj4653@gmail.com> wrote:
    
    > Hi hackers,
    >
    > The write(2) calls that flush server log output aren't covered by wait
    > events. When a backend logs something, the writes go out in:
    >
    >   - write_pipe_chunks(): write(2) to the syslogger pipe
    >   - write_console(): write(2) to stderr (WriteConsoleW() on Windows)
    >
    > If one of those blocks -- syslogger pipe full, slow console, slow log
    > device -- pg_stat_activity just shows wait_event = NULL until it
    > returns. Since NULL usually reads as "on CPU", a backend stuck writing
    > logs looks like it's doing work, so logging-related stalls are easy to
    > miss.
    >
    > Attached is a short series that adds two WaitEventIO events and reports
    > them around those writes:
    >
    >   IO / SysloggerWrite - write(2) to the syslogger pipe
    >   IO / StderrWrite - write(2) to stderr, and WriteConsoleW()
    >
    > 0001 adds the events and covers the write(2) paths. 0002 does the
    > Windows WriteConsoleW() path, split out since it's platform-specific.
    >
    > It only wraps the leaf write call and uses the existing
    > pgstat_report_wait_start()/end() helpers, so it stays allocation-free
    > and safe to call from inside the error-reporting path.
    >
    > I did a quick before/after to make sure the events show up: 8 backends
    > each emitting large RAISE LOG lines, sampling wait_event from
    > pg_stat_activity every 50 ms for 20 s.
    >
    >   - logging_collector = on (syslogger pipe):
    >     master:  NULL                100.0%  (2184/2184)
    >     patched: IO/SysloggerWrite     99.1%  (2204/2224), NULL 0.9%
    >
    >   - logging_collector = off (stderr):
    >     master:  NULL                100.0%  (2144/2144)
    >     patched: IO/StderrWrite        90.7%  (1952/2152), NULL 9.3%
    >
    > On master that wait time is just invisible; with the patch it lands on
    > the new events. I can send the scripts and raw samples if anyone wants
    > to reproduce it.
    >
    +1
      Nice.  We have too many waits that are registered as CPU.
    
    >
    >