Thread

  1. Re: Oom on temp (un-analyzed table caused by JIT) V16.1 [Fixed Already]

    Kirk Wolak <wolakk@gmail.com> — 2024-01-19T00:50:27Z

    On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:43 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
    
    > > On 16 Jan 2024, at 02:53, Kirk Wolak <wolakk@gmail.com> wrote:
    > >
    > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 9:03 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se
    > <mailto:daniel@yesql.se>> wrote:
    > > > On 15 Jan 2024, at 07:24, Kirk Wolak <wolakk@gmail.com <mailto:
    > wolakk@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > >...
    > > Okay, I took the latest source off of git (17devel) and got it to work
    > there in a VM.
    > >
    > > It appears this issue is fixed.  It must have been related to the issue
    > originally tagged.
    >
    > Thanks for testing and confirming!  Testing pre-release builds on real life
    > workloads is invaluable for the development of Postgres so thank you
    > taking the
    > time.
    
    Daniel,
      I did a little more checking and the reason I did not see the link MIGHT
    be because EXPLAIN did not show a JIT attempt.
    I tried to use settings that FORCE a JIT...  But to no avail.
    
      I am now concerned that the problem is more hidden in my use case.
    Meaning I CANNOT conclude it is fixed.
    But I know of NO WAY to force a JIT (I lowered costs to 1, etc.  ).
    
      You don't know a way to force at least the JIT analysis to happen?
    (because I already knew if JIT was off, the leak wouldn't happen).
    
    Thanks,
    
    Kirk Out!
    PS: I assume there is no pg_jit(1) function I can call. LOL