Re: SQL:2011 application time

jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>

From: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-02-02T05:53:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Rename gist stratnum support function

  2. Remove support for temporal RESTRICT foreign keys

  3. Cache NO ACTION foreign keys separately from RESTRICT foreign keys

  4. Fix NO ACTION temporal foreign keys when the referenced endpoints change

  5. Improve whitespace in without_overlaps test

  6. Tests for logical replication with temporal keys

  7. Support for GiST in get_equal_strategy_number()

  8. Make the conditions in IsIndexUsableForReplicaIdentityFull() more explicit

  9. Replace get_equal_strategy_number_for_am() by get_equal_strategy_number()

  10. Improve internal logical replication error for missing equality strategy

  11. Simplify IsIndexUsableForReplicaIdentityFull()

  12. Fix ALTER TABLE / REPLICA IDENTITY for temporal tables

  13. doc: Update pg_constraint.conexclop docs for WITHOUT OVERLAPS

  14. doc: Add PERIOD to ALTER TABLE reference docs

  15. doc: Add WITHOUT OVERLAPS to ALTER TABLE reference docs

  16. Add temporal FOREIGN KEY contraints

  17. Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints

  18. Add stratnum GiST support function

  19. Avoid crashing when a JIT-inlined backend function throws an error.

  20. Revert temporal primary keys and foreign keys

  21. Fix ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE for temporal indexes

  22. Add test for REPLICA IDENTITY with a temporal key

  23. Use half-open interval notation in without_overlaps tests

  24. Use daterange and YMD in without_overlaps tests instead of tsrange.

  25. Rename pg_constraint.conwithoutoverlaps to conperiod

  26. Fix comment on gist_stratnum_btree

  27. Add missing TAP test name

  28. Improve error handling of HMAC computations

  29. Rename functions to avoid future conflicts

Attachments

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 8:00 AM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I fixed your tests, some of your tests can be simplified, (mainly
> primary key constraint is unnecessary for the failed tests)
> also your foreign key patch test table, temporal_rng is created at
> line 141, and we use it at around line 320.
> it's hard to get the definition of temporal_rng.  I drop the table
> and recreate it.
> So people can view the patch with tests more easily.
>
I've attached a new patch that further simplified the tests. (scope
v24 patch's 0002 and 0003)
Please ignore previous email attachments.

I've only applied the v24, 0002, 0003.
seems in doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml
lack the explanation of `<replaceable
class="parameter">temporal_interval</replaceable>`

since foreign key ON {UPDATE | DELETE} {CASCADE,SET NULL,SET DEFAULT}
not yet supported,
v24-0003 create_table.sgml should reflect that.

+ /*
+ * For FKs with PERIOD we need an operator and aggregate function
+ * to check whether the referencing row's range is contained
+ * by the aggregated ranges of the referenced row(s).
+ * For rangetypes this is fk.periodatt <@ range_agg(pk.periodatt).
+ * FKs will look these up at "runtime", but we should make sure
+ * the lookup works here.
+ */
+ if (is_temporal)
+ FindFKPeriodOpersAndProcs(opclasses[numpks - 1], &periodoperoid,
&periodprocoid);

within the function ATAddForeignKeyConstraint, you called
FindFKPeriodOpersAndProcs,
but never used the computed outputs: periodoperoid, periodprocoid,
opclasses.
We validate these(periodoperoid, periodprocoid) at
lookupTRIOperAndProc, FindFKPeriodOpersAndProcs.
I'm not sure whether FindFKPeriodOpersAndProcs in
ATAddForeignKeyConstraint is necessary.

+ * Check if all key values in OLD and NEW are "equivalent":
+ * For normal FKs we check for equality.
+ * For temporal FKs we check that the PK side is a superset of its old
value,
+ * or the FK side is a subset.
"or the FK side is a subset."  is misleading, should it be something
like "or the FK side is a subset of X"?

+ if (indexStruct->indisexclusion) return i - 1;
+ else return i;

I believe our style should be (with proper indent)
if (indexStruct->indisexclusion)
return i - 1;
else
return i;

in transformFkeyCheckAttrs
+ if (found && is_temporal)
+ {
+ found = false;
+ for (j = 0; j < numattrs + 1; j++)
+ {
+ if (periodattnum == indexStruct->indkey.values[j])
+ {
+ opclasses[numattrs] = indclass->values[j];
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }

can be simplified:
{
found = false;
if (periodattnum == indexStruct->indkey.values[numattrs])
{
opclasses[numattrs] = indclass->values[numattrs];
found = true;
}
}

Also wondering, at the end of the function transformFkeyCheckAttrs `if
(!found)` part:
do we need another error message handle is_temporal is true?


@@ -212,8 +213,11 @@ typedef struct NewConstraint
  ConstrType contype; /* CHECK or FOREIGN */
  Oid refrelid; /* PK rel, if FOREIGN */
  Oid refindid; /* OID of PK's index, if FOREIGN */
+ bool conwithperiod; /* Whether the new FOREIGN KEY uses PERIOD */
  Oid conid; /* OID of pg_constraint entry, if FOREIGN */
  Node   *qual; /* Check expr or CONSTR_FOREIGN Constraint */
+ Oid   *operoids; /* oper oids for FOREIGN KEY with PERIOD */
+ Oid   *procoids; /* proc oids for FOREIGN KEY with PERIOD */
  ExprState  *qualstate; /* Execution state for CHECK expr */
 } NewConstraint;
primary key can only one WITHOUT OVERLAPS,
so *operoids and *procoids
can be replaced with just
`operoids, procoids`.
Also these two elements in struct NewConstraint not used in v24, 0002, 0003.