Re: Virtual generated columns

jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>

From: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-07-22T10:53:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Expand virtual generated columns for ALTER COLUMN TYPE

  2. Eliminate code duplication in replace_rte_variables callbacks

  3. Expand virtual generated columns in the planner

  4. Virtual generated columns

  5. Additional tests for stored generated columns

  6. Improve generated_stored test

  7. Fix handling of CREATE DOMAIN with GENERATED constraint syntax

  8. Add pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints

  9. Put generated_stored test objects in a schema

  10. Rename regress test generated to generated_stored

  11. Small code simplification

  12. Remove useless code

  13. Remove useless initializations

  14. doc: Clarify that pg_attrdef also stores generation expressions

  15. Clean out column-level pg_init_privs entries when dropping tables.

  16. Re-implement the ereport() macro using __VA_ARGS__.

another bug?
drop table gtest12v;
CREATE TABLE gtest12v (a int PRIMARY KEY, b bigint, c int GENERATED
ALWAYS AS (b * 2) VIRTUAL);
insert into gtest12v (a,b) values (11,  22147483647);
table gtest12v;

insert ok, but select error:
ERROR:  integer out of range

should insert fail?



CREATE TABLE gtest12v (a int PRIMARY KEY, b bigint, c int GENERATED
ALWAYS AS (b * 2) VIRTUAL);
CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_testx OWNED BY gtest12v.c;

seems to work. But I am not sure if there are any corner cases that
make it not work.
just want to raise this issue.