Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions
Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
From: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
To: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>,
Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-11-25T07:44:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_basebackup: Add missing PQclear in error path
- a19db0827496 18.0 landed
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 at 21:13, Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > What if we say it's not a bug, but a feature. Will it break some contracts > with user or some functionality? An important thing to note here. We have to trade off an opportunity to significantly improve temp tables performance by removing locks for a "not a bug, but a feature". This seems odd to me. Arguably, the number of people who need faster temp relations is greater than the number of people who want to have access to temp relations of other backends. -- Best regards, Maxim Orlov.