Re: Add Index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs
Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
From: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-11T13:43:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 09:22, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > The problem may be actually trickier than that, no? Could there be > other factors to take into account for their classification, like > their sizes (typically, we'd want to process the biggest one first, I > guess)? Sorry for a late reply. Thanks for an explanation. This is sounds reasonable to me. Svetlana had addressed this in the patch v2. -- Best regards, Maxim Orlov.
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
reindexdb: Fix warning about uninitialized indices_tables_cell
- cc0e7ebd304a 17.0 landed
-
reindexdb: Add the index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs
- 47f99a407de2 17.0 landed